Baao
and Ockhams’s Razor
by
P.B.Robosa
While
in discussion with two of my colleagues at USI, one teaching Philosophy and the
other History, the latter brought up the subject of place-names and said that
almost all places now seem to have a local legend as to how a place-name came
to be and added this was the fault of the Americans who taught us to read and
write about this stories. Incredulously I checked my files and but found this
not true as my Spanish sources also contain explanations of the origin of place
names but comparing the Baao history of Luis Dato with that of the Spanish
historian Felix Huertas which are two popular sources, I found something
interesting about the two. While Dato actually used Huertas as his source, it
was only he who wrote about of the possible origins of the name Baao giving us
three theories the first two being widely accepted:
1. Baao comes from the shape of the early settlement which was shaped like the
backside/carapace of the turtle which in local vernacular referred to as a
"ba-oo".
2. The name Baao came directly from the aforementioned reptile which in large
numbers inhabits the lake.
3. The name came about due to the penchant of the inhabitants of eating left
over rice locally called "bahaw".
Huertas, however, writing much earlier using Franciscan records mentions none
of these, although he does so with other places. In Huertas’ 1855 Estado, the
pertinent line referring to the origin of the town reads, “Antiguamente, estuvo
situado a la orilla de la laguna del mismo nombre, en el sitio llamado layoan.”.
Translated it reads: In ancient times, (the pueblo of Baao) was situated in the
banks of the lake of the same name, in the site called layoan.
This puts forward some questions like, which came first, the name of the lake or the name of the settlement? Did the name Baao came from the name of the Lake Baao or vice versa.
This puts forward some questions like, which came first, the name of the lake or the name of the settlement? Did the name Baao came from the name of the Lake Baao or vice versa.
Which is connected with theory number two, did the lake or consequently Baao
came from
an alleged preponderance of turtles in the area?
A
year ago, I went to see these places mentioned by Huertas, The Lake would
really be shallow to be able to see layoan otherwise the place would be
under water and indeed the banks would accommodate an ancient settlement that
would have been widely spread out to give room for living space. About two
kilometer south is sitio Mawacag, the ancient burial site that yielded a
cache of Chinese porcelain giving proof to the site as a pre-hispanic
settlement. If the Lake was named after the turtle, the reptile is now
difficult to find now largely replaced by field rats. The ancient binanuaan site
a circular mound overgrown with brush and bamboo is east of layoan and
would be too small to contain a village but most likely the site of a town
center, a chapel or a market place, but again the lake would really be shallow
for the mound to be of any use for human activity but from afar would look like
the backside of a turtle just like any island would look in flat water. I
understood why the village kept moving east up to the present site, if Layoan
was inundated, binanuaanan was not, if binanuaanan was flooded
the present site was not and I understood how Dato could make sense of all of
these and came up with a believable theory. Then my friend, the Philosophy
teacher introduced me to William of Ockham and his scientific precept called
Ockham’s razor. Ockham’s razor is a fundamental principle of modern science and
philosophy which said that one should not assume the existence of more things
than are logically necessary and the simplest explanation tends to be the
correct one. A theory, using this principle, can be stripped down of the
unessential with a metaphorical “razor” to reveal what would be the most likely
explanation.
Using it on the Baao place-name and starting with the bare essentials, Baao was first used in a census document in 1590 with the spelling of “Bao”. The first time the place was indicated in a map was in Murillo-Velarde’s 1733 map but the village was not identified but the lake which was marked as “Laguna de Bao”.
Using it on the Baao place-name and starting with the bare essentials, Baao was first used in a census document in 1590 with the spelling of “Bao”. The first time the place was indicated in a map was in Murillo-Velarde’s 1733 map but the village was not identified but the lake which was marked as “Laguna de Bao”.
We should remember that Bao or Baao is the name of a place not a group of
people thus we can safely discard Dato’s number three theory that Baao came
from the behavior of its people of eating cold rice, which anyone could do
anywhere.
Now, is the name referring to the lake or the village? Before the Spaniards came there was no Baao as village, the inhabitants dwelt on the banks of the lake, only when they were converted did the people gathered in one place within reach of the church and the tribute collectors. The early settlement of binanuaanan, the one resembling a turtles back would be used only years later after the “encomienda” or “visita” Bao was already mentioned in documents.
Now, is the name referring to the lake or the village? Before the Spaniards came there was no Baao as village, the inhabitants dwelt on the banks of the lake, only when they were converted did the people gathered in one place within reach of the church and the tribute collectors. The early settlement of binanuaanan, the one resembling a turtles back would be used only years later after the “encomienda” or “visita” Bao was already mentioned in documents.
Although
it is not enough that Huertas mentions it and Murillo-Velarde used it, they are
believable sources that say Bao came from the name of the lake. Common sense
and experience will tell us that the natural tendency of place names being
created and catching on is the presence of a prominent landmark. Notably, in
the case of Lake Bao, a lake that is uniquely shallow. Thus, the theory that in
ancient times, the place where the people on the banks of Lake Bao inhabited
and which became a village to be called Baao is the simplest explanation that
would result to satisfy Ockham’s principle. We now would find ourselves then
trying to answer the question, from whence did the name Bao come from? Was
there a abundance of turtle in the lake? To be simple again, let us assume
there was not, and say that the name came from the description of the shallow lake,
which in local dialect is variously “ababow” and “mababow” or a description of
the banks “ibabow” all would be closer in phonation to the spelling of “bao”
than “ba-oo”, a closer one would be the Tagalog “bao” which is unlikely as the
Bicol equivalent is “soro” or the Baaoeño “abab”.
The simplest explanation then for the source of the name of Baao is that in on
the banks of a shallow lake (mababow) inhabited a group of people which
the Spaniard unified into a village which they called “Bao” from the name of
the lake. The name was carried whenever the people moved eastward to avoid the
constant flooding and in four centuries the Municipality of Baao became better
known than the lake from where it got its name.
No comments:
Post a Comment